Subscribe

Latest Blog Post

part presentation playbook

Risk Assessment for the Robotiq 2-Finger Gripper

Mathieu Bélanger-Barrette
by Mathieu Bélanger-Barrette on Apr 19, 2018 7:00:00 AM

 Assessing the risks of a collaborative robot is a complex process. It involves many  different risks, probabilities, and – most importantly – devices. And it's sometimes hard to get all the safety data for each device.

In this article, we'll give you a few tips on evaluating our 2-Finger Gripper.


What is a risk assessment for collaborative robots?

Since you will need to know exactly what is a risk assessment and how to do it, I highly suggest that you read the following documents so we can talk the language.

How do you evaluate risk?

When analyzing risk, you need to evaluate each potential risk and rank them on a standardized scale.

We use four different factors to qualify a risk:

  • Degree of Possible Harm (DPH)
  • Possibility of Occurrence (PO)
  • Possibility of Avoidance (PA)
  • Frequency of Exposure (FE)

All these factors have different levels attached to them. Once each factor has been evaluated, we use this formula to obtain the hazard rating:

HR = DPH x PO x PA x FE.

The risk assessment template (that we linked to above) provides more details on the points accorded to different criteria. For example, Degree of Possible Harm is determined as follows.

 

Degree of Possible Harm (DPH):

0.25 Scratch/Bruise

0.5 Laceration/cut/mild ill health effect/minor burns

3 Fracture of minor bone – fingers, toes

5 Fracture of major bone – hand, arm, leg

8 Loss of 1 or 2 fingers/toes or major burns

11 Leg/hand amputation, partial loss of hearing or eye

15 Amputation of 2 legs/hands, total loss of hearing/sight in both ears/eyes

25 Critical injuries or permanent illness/condition/injury

40 Single Fatality

65 Catastrophe

Taken from Pilz Hazard Rating; Risk Assessment eBook

 

 

If you need more information on what type of impact or force level will produce a certain injury, refer to the ISO/TS 15066 standard.

When all the criteria have been calculated for each risk, you can estimate whether the risk is acceptable, or a critical one that must be reduced.

Again the risk evaluation scale is available in the Risk Assessment for Collaborative Robot template. With that covered, let’s get into the details of the 2-Finger Gripper specifically. 

 

What are the potential risks of the 2-Finger Gripper?

We have identified four main risks to using the Gripper:

  • Crushing of a body part when the fingers are closing
  • Crushing of a body part when the gripper is hitting a surface (semi-static impact)
  • Transient impact during robot motion
  • Entrapment of a body part in the open finger linkage

 

 

Transient impact vs. quasi-static impact

 

What's the hazard rating for each risk?

Here we'll try doing a risk evaluation for each identified risk.

However, as you might imagine, there are many more risks that could be involved. Proper risk assessments always have to consider all the different devices and actions of the robotic cell.

That being said, let’s proceed with our "mini" risk evaluation.

 

Crushing of a body part when the fingers are closing

 Capture d’écran 2018-04-18 à 17.52.24

This hazard is rated a negligible risk on the Pilz Hazard Rating. 

 

 

 Safe Pressure Level

Crushing of a body part when the gripper is hitting a surface

Note that in this case, the pressure level may be higher than the force level. You may need to calculate the area where the force is applied and translate it into pressure.

 Capture d’écran 2018-04-18 à 17.53.11 

This hazard is rated a low risk on the Pilz Hazard Rating.

 

Transient impact during robot motion

In the ISO/TS 15066 we can see that the pain threshold is two times higher during a transient impact than during a quasi-static impact. That means that during a transient impact, the user can be hit with twice as much force as during a quasi-static impact and feel the same pain level. That being said, the degree of possible harm at a same force is a lot lower.

 Capture d’écran 2018-04-18 à 17.54.04

This hazard is rated a negligible risk on the Pilz Hazard Rating.

 

Entrapment of a body part in the open finger linkage

Entrapment in the mechanical linkage is quite hard to quantify in terms of injury or pain level. We will estimate that a small fracture can occur.

 Capture d’écran 2018-04-18 à 17.55.47 

This hazard is rated a low risk on the Pilz Hazard Rating.

In order to reduce that risk, Robotiq offers protective covers that can cover all the open finger linkages. Use of these covers lowers the possibility of occurrence (PO) to Almost Impossible (0.05), which reduces the HR to 0.93.

 

null

Covers for the Robotiq 2-Finger Adaptive Robot Gripper 

As you might have noticed, our analysis concludes that the 2-Finger Gripper presents no major risks. However, the risks we presented here are merely examples of what can happen – they are not an exclusive list.

There are plenty of other risks involved in using the Gripper and robot.  Download our eBook to learn more about how to evaluate them. 

 Howto perform a risk assessment for collaborative robots cover image

Leave a comment

Mathieu Bélanger-Barrette
Mathieu is a production engineer at Robotiq, where he constantly strives to optimize the production line for Robotiq Grippers. He enjoys discovering new robotic applications and sharing what he learns on Robotiq's blog.
Connect with the writer:

Related posts

15 Mistakes People Make With Cobot Safety

Even collaborative robots can have safety problems, but only if you make a mistake. Here are 15 common mistakes that people...

Alex Owen-Hill
By Alex Owen-Hill - November 6, 2018
How to Perform a Risk Assessment for Collaborative Robots

There's no doubt that collaborative robots have shaken up the industrial market, given their revolutionary ability to interact...

Mariane Davids
By Mariane Davids - May 7, 2018