Subscribe

Select Topics

Posts by Tag

See all

Latest Blog Post

Transient VS Quasi-Static: Understand the Different Contact Types in Risk Assessment

Mathieu Bélanger-Barrette
by Mathieu Bélanger-Barrette. Last updated on Aug 16, 2016 7:00 AM
Posted on Aug 16, 2016 7:00 AM. 2 min read time

Since collaborative robot safety is a huge concern for our end-users, we thought it was important to release some content on this subject. You may already have taken a look at our different eBooks about safety for collaborative robots. This time, we thought that explaining safety concepts with short  videos would help you figure out a couple of additional details. 

This first video is about the difference between two types of impacts listed in the ISO/TS 15066. In fact, quasi-static and transient impacts can both occur when working alongside a robot co-worker. 


Quasi-Static

A quasi-static impact occurs when the robot crushes a human's body part against a fixed object. In this video, we illustrate this example by demonstrating the robot crushing the hand of the worker against a table. 

Transient

This type of impact occurs when the robot enters in contact with a human's body part without any restrictions. In other words, the body part can move freely under the robot's force. 

hand.png

Why Do I Need to Know that? 

Well, as you probably figured, a quasi-static impact can be a lot more harmful than a transient impact. Since the ISO/TS 15066 standard has differentiated these two types of impacts, they also defined different pain thresholds for each type. The general rule is a transient impact can apply a force two times higher than a quasi-static impact. For example, if a robot crushes your hand against a table, a maximal force of 135N should be reached before reaching the human pain threshold. In the other case, in a transient impact, a force of 270N can be reached before getting into the pain threshold. 

We also posted a couple of other videos that can help you understand some other safety concepts. Stay tuned for more content on collaborative robot safety. 

Other Videos

Pressure Calculation

Risk Assessment Process

 

 

Leave a comment

Mathieu Bélanger-Barrette
Mathieu is a production engineer at Robotiq, where he constantly strives to optimize the production line for Robotiq Grippers. He enjoys discovering new robotic applications and sharing what he learns on Robotiq's blog.
Connect with the writer:
http://robotiq.com

Related posts

8 Benefits of Palletizing Cobots in the Coffee and Tea Packaging Process

The coffee industry is very competitive. If you're looking for a way to solve labor shortages, speed up your processes, reduce...

Nicolas Lauzier
By Nicolas Lauzier - November 16, 2022
Improve Your Efficiency in Logistics Operations With Robots

Is it possible to improve the efficiency in logistics with robotics?

Unlike in other areas, it's not always obvious how robots...

Alex Owen-Hill
By Alex Owen-Hill - November 12, 2021
Packaging in Logistics: How to Streamline Packaging With Cobots

Packaging is a core task in logistics. But, a lot of packaging processes are inefficient. They are not well suited to the...

Alex Owen-Hill
By Alex Owen-Hill - October 29, 2021