Assessing the risks of a collaborative robot is a complex process. It involves many different risks, probabilities, and – most importantly – devices. And it's sometimes hard to get all the safety data for each device.
In this article, we'll give you a few tips on evaluating our 2-Finger Gripper.
Since you will need to know exactly what is a risk assessment and how to do it, I highly suggest that you read the following documents so we can talk the language.
When analyzing risk, you need to evaluate each potential risk and rank them on a standardized scale.
We use four different factors to qualify a risk:
All these factors have different levels attached to them. Once each factor has been evaluated, we use this formula to obtain the hazard rating:
HR = DPH x PO x PA x FE.
The risk assessment template (that we linked to above) provides more details on the points accorded to different criteria. For example, Degree of Possible Harm is determined as follows.
Degree of Possible Harm (DPH):
0.25 Scratch/Bruise
0.5 Laceration/cut/mild ill health effect/minor burns
3 Fracture of minor bone – fingers, toes
5 Fracture of major bone – hand, arm, leg
8 Loss of 1 or 2 fingers/toes or major burns
11 Leg/hand amputation, partial loss of hearing or eye
15 Amputation of 2 legs/hands, total loss of hearing/sight in both ears/eyes
25 Critical injuries or permanent illness/condition/injury
40 Single Fatality
65 Catastrophe
Taken from Pilz Hazard Rating; Risk Assessment eBook
If you need more information on what type of impact or force level will produce a certain injury, refer to the ISO/TS 15066 standard.
When all the criteria have been calculated for each risk, you can estimate whether the risk is acceptable, or a critical one that must be reduced.
Again the risk evaluation scale is available in the Risk Assessment for Collaborative Robot template. With that covered, let’s get into the details of the 2-Finger Gripper specifically.
We have identified four main risks to using the Gripper:
Transient impact vs. quasi-static impact
Here we'll try doing a risk evaluation for each identified risk.
However, as you might imagine, there are many more risks that could be involved. Proper risk assessments always have to consider all the different devices and actions of the robotic cell.
That being said, let’s proceed with our "mini" risk evaluation.
This hazard is rated a negligible risk on the Pilz Hazard Rating.
Safe Pressure Level
Note that in this case, the pressure level may be higher than the force level. You may need to calculate the area where the force is applied and translate it into pressure.
This hazard is rated a low risk on the Pilz Hazard Rating.
In the ISO/TS 15066 we can see that the pain threshold is two times higher during a transient impact than during a quasi-static impact. That means that during a transient impact, the user can be hit with twice as much force as during a quasi-static impact and feel the same pain level. That being said, the degree of possible harm at a same force is a lot lower.
This hazard is rated a negligible risk on the Pilz Hazard Rating.
Entrapment in the mechanical linkage is quite hard to quantify in terms of injury or pain level. We will estimate that a small fracture can occur.
This hazard is rated a low risk on the Pilz Hazard Rating.
In order to reduce that risk, Robotiq offers protective covers that can cover all the open finger linkages. Use of these covers lowers the possibility of occurrence (PO) to Almost Impossible (0.05), which reduces the HR to 0.93.
Covers for the Robotiq 2-Finger Adaptive Robot Gripper
As you might have noticed, our analysis concludes that the 2-Finger Gripper presents no major risks. However, the risks we presented here are merely examples of what can happen – they are not an exclusive list.
There are plenty of other risks involved in using the Gripper and robot. Download our eBook to learn more about how to evaluate them.