Are robots feasible for high-mix, low-volume job shops? What is the difference between job shops and flow shops? Here are the answers.
Motoman calls it your "manufacturing DNA" — the route your products take through your process.
Do you run a job shop, a flow shop or a mix of both? The question is fundamental when you are considering introducing robots. If you have a job shop, you might worry that collaborative robots aren't for you. How can you automate processes that are constantly changing, right?
Let's have a look at how collaborative robots apply to these different environments:
Job shops, flow shops and the other types of "shop" are a way of describing the route that products take through your manufacturing processes.
If your products move through a linear, unchanging sequence of steps — with one operation per machine — you probably have a flow shop. If your products move from machine to machine in a manner that you could call "all over the place" you might have a job shop. Or you might have another type of shop entirely.
High-volume manufacturers (e.g. automotive) traditionally use a flow shop model, with each stage happening in exactly the same order every time.
The key to flow shop scheduling is that the product goes through each step of the process only once. If the product needs two drilling operations, for example, you will have two drilling machines.
Some advantages of flow shops are:
Some disadvantages of flow shops are:
Flow shops have used robots for many years. Due to their consistent operations, it is easy to identify where robots could help the process.
Most small machine shops deal with high-mix, low-volume products and often use a job shop model. Machines are grouped by functionality and the product moves between them as and when they need to, often passing through the same machine several times before it leaves the machine shop.
Products do follow a "flow" (of sorts) but it is usually unplanned — or only loosely planned — and it rarely stays consistent.
Some advantages of job shops are:
Some disadvantages of jobs shops are:
Another consideration for job shops is that they require more skilled workers than many flow shops. Depending on your situation, this might be an advantage or a disadvantage. However, we usually think of it as a good thing.
Consider what Sequoia Automatic's manager Dennis J. Burke said when he introduced robots to their job shop:
"It's easier to find employees willing to run several robots than it is to find a worker willing to load and unload a machine tool all day long. We can sell ‘thinking jobs' to prospective employees; it's harder to sell non-thinking, monotonous jobs."
Job shops are traditionally a challenge for robots. However, this is starting to change.
There are other types of routing which you can find in manufacturing. For example:
Traditional industrial robots required consistent, repeatable tasks. In the past, this has meant that they were only suitable for highly ordered flow shops. The initial investment was high and it took a long time to set up the robot.
That has all changed since the introduction of collaborative robots.
Collaborative robots can be used in job shops as easily as they can in flow shops — well… almost as easily.
Cobots have several advantages which means that they can overcome the challenges traditionally associated with automation in a job shop:
Yes, job shops were traditionally a challenge for robots. But with collaborative robots, there is now no reason not to introduce automation into your machine shop, whether you have a job shop, a flow shop or something else entirely.
Do you have a job shop, flow shop or something else? What concerns do you have about applying collaborative robots? What tasks are challenging for you to apply automation? Tell us in the comments below or join the discussion on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook or the DoF professional robotics community.