Latest Blog Post

New Call-to-action

Moving to In-House Robotics Expertise: What to Expect

Alex Owen-Hill
by Alex Owen-Hill on Jan 17, 2017 7:00:00 AM

Are you ready to move to in-house robotics expertise? We understand if you are unsure about making the move. Here are seven changes you can expect following the decision to choose in in-house expertise over outsourcing.


Do you think your company is ready to handle its own robotics integration? Here at Robotiq, we think that many businesses have the ability to in-house their robotics expertise. The advantages are huge, like reducing your reliance on outsourcing and turning an expense into an investment. That's why we have created resources like our blog series How to Integrate Your First Robot and the learning kit Getting Started With Collaborative Robots.

You might be unsure if you are ready to start integrating robotics yourself, especially if you're used to outsourcing. You may worry that you don't have the resources to develop in-house expertise. In some ways, it's easier to get started if you have never used robots before as you have nothing to compare it to. However, like most major business changes, the challenge mostly comes when you're not prepared for the change; when you don't know what to expect.

In this article, we look at what you can expect when your business moves to in-house robotics expertise. With a little bit of preparation, the move can be quick, easy and even enjoyable.


Seven Changes to Expect With In-House Robotics Expertise

There are many changes you can expect after a move to in-house robotics expertise, including increased productivity, more efficient process design, and maximized use of collaborative robots. But, aside from these productivity changes you can also expect some cultural changes in the business. Here are seven changes you can expect after the decision has been made to go in-house.

1. A Transition Period

Nothing happens immediately in business and a move to train workforce is likely to happen gradually. Having said that, you could easily acquire a new collaborative robot and get it performing a simple task within one or two days. However, to develop a deeper level of robotics expertise, the workforce will need time to get used to the technology. They will also need training.

2. Training

Mcost_training-149679-edited.jpgCollaborative robots require much less training than traditional industrial robots did. Even so, training is going to be an integral part of the move to in-house expertise. Training is not a "once in a lifetime" thing if you want to develop capable, flexible in-house robotics experts. Instead, it should become a regular event on the calendar. Robotic technology is continually improving and there are always additional skills that people can be trained in, such as adding extra sensors or advanced gripping strategies.

It's wise to introduce new skills and trainings gradually. This allows people to assimilate the new knowledge and skills, and put them into practice. It also means that the initial training investment will be lower and trainings will take less time away from work.

3. Teething Problems

As you know, there are teething problems with every new project. This is completely normal and it is likely that a few mistakes will be made as your in-house experts get used to their new roles. This can be a bit stressful — especially if you're used to working with an outsourced robotics company — as it feels like you no longer have a "safety net" to help you when things go wrong. For this reason, it can be really valuable to join a community of robotics professionals, where you will be able to discuss your ideas and challenges with people who are in a similar situation to you. We created our DoF Community for exactly this purpose, and it's free to join.

4. More Responsibility

factory-meeting.jpgThis loss of a "safety net" from an external robotics company is really a symptom of a larger change: more responsibility. I'm not just talking about the added responsibility that your new, in-house robotics experts will have. The whole business will have more responsibility for the operation, and productivity, of the robot.

For many businesses, the anxiety behind this situation often comes from the thought that "if something goes wrong, I'll have to pay for it." While there is an element of truth in this, it is based on the incorrect assumption that you don't have to pay for the mistakes of outsourced companies. In reality, even if the monetary cost is shouldered by the other company, all unplanned changes cost your company time and effort. The big advantage with in-house expertise is that you can use the slip-ups as a learning experience, to develop and improve your robotics knowledge and usage. Also, "mistakes" are almost never as bad as we imagine they will be; don't let fear stop you from doing something momentous. 

5. More and Better Ideas

This is one of the biggest advantages to having robotics experts on-staff. The new in-house experts will be involved in the decision-making processes about the robot. They will always on the lookout for ways to improve the use of the robot and, as a result, you can get much more out of the robotic investment. Ideas are the lifeblood of a business. By developing in-house robotics expertise, workers will be empowered to have more ideas which are better aligned with the realities of the business.

6. A Shift of Time Usage

foxconn.jpgTime is a scarce resource, and it's amazing how much of it we waste on non-value-added tasks. In the long run, in-house robotics expertise will probably save you time compared to using outsourced companies. However, at the early stages, it's more realistic to say that the time will be shifted from one activity to another.

Outsourcing takes up time in many ways, including: comparing different suppliers, negotiating contracts, communicating needs, waiting for the company to complete the job, etc. All this time can be shifted to training and integrating the robot, which are both investments for your in-house expertise.

7. A New Language Within Workforce

The final change which you can expect from a move to in-house expertise — which you might not have considered before — is that everyone on your team will start to "speak the same language" when communicating about the robot. This might seem a small thing, but it can translate to better efficiency and accuracy when it comes to discussing the robot's operations.

Unless you have been lucky enough to have contact with the same integrator for a long time, this doesn't happen with an outsourced company. They are not incorporated into the culture of your company, so all communications have to be formalized to make sure that everyone understands each other properly. By comparison, a culture of in-house robotics expertise can result in quicker, more flexible communications about the process. This will allow you to make the best use of the inherent flexibility of collaborative robots.


What concerns do you have about moving to in-house robotics expertise? How have you invested in robotics expertise in the past? What would you expect to happen following such a move? Tell us in the comments below or join the discussion on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook or the DoF professional robotics community.


Subscribe to Robotiq's Blog

Leave a comment

Alex Owen-Hill
Written by Alex Owen-Hill
Alex Owen-Hill is a freelance writer and blogger who writes about a large range of topics, including science, language, creativity and (of course) robotics. He completed a PhD in Telerobotics from Universidad Politecnica de Madrid as part of the PURESAFE project, in collaboration with CERN. As a recovering academic, he maintains a firm foot in the robotics world by blogging for gripper manufacturer Robotiq.
Connect with the writer:

Related posts

Why Humans Should Stop Worrying About Robots Taking Their Jobs

When the topic of robots in manufacturing comes up, the first thing people talk about is a fear of losing their jobs to robotic...

Mariane Davids
By Mariane Davids - June 19, 2017
What's New in Robotics This Week - Jun 16

Manufacturing & cobot roundup, the Tertill launch, Softbank-Boston dynamics deal, 2060: It begins and much more! We hope that...

Emmet Cole
By Emmet Cole - June 16, 2017
How Today's Collaborative Robots Are Cheaper Than Fenced Options

Until recent years, robots in manufacturing were limited to fenced options that were large, took up a lot of space on the...

Mariane Davids
By Mariane Davids - June 13, 2017

Robotic grinding, polishing, sanding, deburring and finishing applications growth

In the future, robotic grinding, polishing, sanding, deburring and finishing applications will be as big as robotic welding. Read more

Using 2 finger gripper attached to UR10 through ROS

Hello,We have a robot UR10 with a 2 finger gripper connected to the Robot controller through one of the USB port. We can manage to control the robot using the modern driver and ROS on another network...Read more

ROS Configuration for the C-Gripper

Hello,We have a problem with the communication with a robotiq gripper using ROS. I will explain the problem with more detail to check if you can help us.We have a robot UR10 with a C-model Gripper (2...Read more

How can I make a UR5 draw arcs and circles?

Hi!I want to make the UR5 make draw random lines, arcs and circles on a piece of paper. My approach for that so far was to generate the geometry in Processing (Java for creatives..) and send points...Read more